Original Articles

Influence of Preparation Height on Digital Impression Trueness: A Comparative Study of 2 Intraoral Scanners

Volume 4 Publish Date: October 28, 2025
Full Text PDF
DOI
Yunus Emre Özden ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Zeynep Yılmaz ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Zeynep Özkurt Kayahan ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Ender Kazazoğlu ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Özden, Y. E., Yılmaz, Z., Özkurt Kayahan, Z., & Kazazoğlu, E. (2025). Influence of Preparation Height on Digital Impression Trueness: A Comparative Study of 2 Intraoral Scanners. Essentials of Dentistry, 4, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5152/EssentDent.2025.25030
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the effect of crown preparation height on the trueness of intraoral scanners (IOS) by comparing 2 different scanners at varying preparation heights.

Methods: A typodont model was prepared with a chamfer finish line at 2 different crown heights (7 mm and 5 mm). A laboratory scanner (E1, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to obtain a reference scan. Intraoral scanners, Trios 3 (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and iTero Element 5D Plus (Align Technologies, San Jose, USA), were used for digital impressions. Ten scans were taken for each preparation height per scanner, resulting in a total of 40 scans. The trueness was assessed using Geomagic Control X software by calculating root mean square (RMS) error values between IOS scans and the reference model. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS v29. An independent sample t-test was applied (α=0.05).

Results: The iTero scanner exhibited significantly lower RMS values (0.040 ± 0.005 mm) compared to the Trios 3 scanner (0.049 ± 0.006 mm, P < .001), indicating higher overall trueness. The Trios 3 scanner showed a significant difference in trueness between 5 mm (0.051 ± 0.005 mm) and 7 mm (0.046 ± 0.006 mm) preparations (P=.043), demonstrating improved trueness with greater preparation height. In contrast, the iTero scanner maintained consistent trueness across both preparation heights (P=.451).

Conclusion: The trueness varies depending on the intraoral scanner used. Crown height is a factor that affects trueness depending on the scanner.

Cite this article as: Özden YE, Yılmaz Z, Özkurt Kayahan Z, Kazazoğlu E. Influence of preparation height on digital impression trueness: a comparative study of 2 intraoral scanners. Essent Dent. 2025, 4, 0030, doi:10.5152/EssentDent.2025.25030.

Article Info
Published In
Journal Essentials of Dentistry
Volume / Issue Volume 4
Pages 1-6
History
Published Online October 28, 2025
Affiliations
Yunus Emre Özden ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Zeynep Yılmaz ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Zeynep Özkurt Kayahan ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Ender Kazazoğlu ORCID
Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Türkiye
Cite this Article
Özden, Y. E., Yılmaz, Z., Özkurt Kayahan, Z., & Kazazoğlu, E. (2025). Influence of Preparation Height on Digital Impression Trueness: A Comparative Study of 2 Intraoral Scanners. Essentials of Dentistry, 4, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5152/EssentDent.2025.25030
Share
Outlines